Summer 2019 POL 241 Chap 5 "Problematic Lucidity: Stephen Krasner's "State Power and the Structure of International Trade" By Robert Keohane"
Elayne
Guzman
Problematic Lucidity: Stephen Krasner's "State Power and the
Structure of International Trade" By Robert Keohane.
Quote:
“Some of the appeal of “State Power”
derives from its clear specification puzzle. Puzzles are central to social
science, and Krasner’s puzzle is an important one. Why, he asks, has the world
economy vacillated between openness and closure? Krasner carefully defines the
continuum between openness and closure. While acknowledging the significance of
movements of capital, labor and technology, he focuses on trade”.
Meaning/Chosen:
Keohane focuses on openness and closure in the structure of international
trade that Krasner argued. In terms of openness, state power is related to
hegemonic ascendency that is more likely to create openness and also determines
economic patterns. A powerful state with
a technology advantage over other states will desire an open trading system as
it seeks new export markets. Furthermore large powerful states are less exposed
to the international economy than small ones, so Krasner called “the
opportunity cost of closure’ will be lower too.
According to Keohane, a crucial factor in
Krasner’s argument is his claim that states do not always privilege wealth over
other goals. Political power and social stability are also crucial and this
means that, although open trade may well provide absolute gains for all states
who engage in it, some states will gain more than others. Keohane makes the interest point that it was
powerful not only because it subverted the conventional wisdom, of liberals,
but because it contained flaws and suggested further avenues for research that
inspired a whole generation of scholars.
Reference:
Problematic
Lucidity: Stephen Krasner's "State Power and the Structure of
International Trade" Author(s): Robert O. Keohane Source: World Politics,
Vol. 50, No. 1, Fiftieth Anniversary Special Issue (Oct., 1997), pp. 150-170.
Comments
Post a Comment